Tampilkan postingan dengan label Evangelicalism. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Evangelicalism. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 19 Januari 2012

Love Jesus but Hate Religion?


THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: On January 10, 2012, Jefferson Bethke uploaded a video to YouTube that recorded a poem he had written, in which he said that Jesus hates religion, that he came to abolish religion, and that Jesus Christ is opposed to religion. Of course, this is a highly Evangelical way of thinking, but the video was an overnight sensation. As of the date of this blog entry, it has received more than 15 million views. The video is here...


In addition to the Catholic reply above, the video has also prompted a response from Fr. Robert Barron here...

Senin, 13 Desember 2010

Capilla Calvario es anti-católico?

EL CABALLERO CATÓLICO: En una palabra, "Sí". Calvary Chapel (www.CalvaryChapel.com) es anti-católico. Ahora la gente buena no lo negaría. Ellos dicen que aman a los católicos, pero odian el "sistema católico romano religioso." Todo eso está muy bien, pero ser anti-católica no se trata de odio, o aversión a la gente católica. Ser anti-católica, por su propia definición, significa estar en contra de la religión del catolicismo romano. Hagan lo que puedan para esquivar la cuestión, Calvary Chapel es una organización anti-católica.

En sentido amplio, podríamos argumentar que todas las iglesias protestantes son anti-católicas en algún pequeño grado, por el simple hecho de que ellos son protestantes. Históricamente, esto sería cierto. Sin embargo, aunque la mayoría de los grupos protestantes y evangélicos no tratan de enfatizar esto, algunas organizaciones han surgido en los últimos años que son mucho más anti-católicas que otros. Creo que Calvary Chapel definitivamente entra en esta categoría. Aunque no estoy al tanto de toda la documentación oficial de las posiciones anti-católicas de la Capilla del Calvario, uno puede encontrar fácilmente que la mayoría de los sermones de Domingo llenos de anti-catolicismo. Un buen ejemplo de esto viene del pastor Chuck Smith, fundador de la afiliación de Calvary Chapel. Lo bueno de Calvary Chapel es que la mayoría de los sermones son grabados y archivados, así que si uno tiene el tiempo para hacer la “pesca”, la evidencia de un flagrante anti-catolicismo no es demasiado difícil de encontrar. Ahora recuerde, estos son los sermones de un pastor a su congregación. Uno pensaría que un pastor debe de ocuparse de la predicación del evangelio, y la aplicación de las enseñanzas del Nuevo Testamento para la vida cotidiana de su congregación. En cambio, este es el tipo de cosas que uno puede encontrar fácilmente en los sermones del Calvery Chapel...

En la cinta de grabaciones numero 5176,, el Pastor Chuck Smith dijo:
El dogma que se desarrolló en la iglesia católica de la virginidad perpetua de María, es pura tontería. Es la invención de los hombres que han pensado para elevar a María a un lugar de deidad. El hecho evidente es aquí ", y no la conocía 'hasta…'" Está claro que después, que tenía las relaciones normales entre esposos, entre sí, o que los hijos e hijas que han nacido de María, también nacieron de una virgen, y que eso arrojaría toda la historia en desorden. El evangelio de Marcos ofrece nombres de los hermanos de Jesús, Jacobo, José y Simón, y menciona a sus hermanas, para declarar que la virginidad perpetua de María no es una verdad bíblica. Se trata de un dogma católico, sin fundamento bíblico, al igual que la mayoría de los dogmas. Pablo dijo: "Guardaos de los perros" (Fil. 3:02), yo digo: "Tengan cuidado con los dogmas!"
En la cinta 5189, Smith dijo:
Porque uno es vuestro padre, que está en los cielos. "Así que el título de padre fue prohibido por Jesús. En mis asociaciones, entre mis amigos he conocido muchos ministros en la Iglesia Episcopal, y también dentro de la Iglesia Católica. Y tengo una extrema dificultad en saber cómo hacer frente a eso. Porque por mi vida no puedo llamarlos padre fulano de tal. Porque Jesús dijo que no, y eso me crea una cosa difícil, en cuanto a la manera de resolverlos, porque suelen ser introducido, "este es el padre de fulano de tal, y sólo tengo la opción de no tratar con un hombre que se llama “padre” en un sentido espiritual. No sé, hagan lo que quieran, pero yo tengo problemas.
En la cinta 5209, Smith dijo:
La Reforma Protestante fue una protesta contra las malas prácticas que han surgido dentro de la Iglesia Católica. Especialmente la venta de indulgencias. El Papa deseaba construir la gran catedral en Roma, San Pedro, y el dinero no venía, lo suficientemente rápido como para construir este monumento glorioso, que estaba deseando poner, como un símbolo para el cristianismo. Y porque a alguien en el consejo se le ocurrió una idea brillante. Todo el mundo le gusta el pecado, ¿por qué no vender el perdón de pecado?. Y se puede comprar una indulgencia, antes de que se entregara al pecado. Así que a medida que entregarse al pecado, está cubierto, porque ya han comprado su perdón. ¿Así es que quieres una pequeña escapada a un lado?. ¿Quieres salir y emborracharse? Bien. Bajar y comprar su indulgencia “borracho”. ¿Usted quiere tener una aventura? Baje y obtenga una indulgencia “adulterio”. Y comenzó a vender las indulgencias a la gente. Y esto enfureció a Martín Lutero, que tuvo en sus 95 tesis, sus objeciones a las prácticas que se habían desarrollado dentro de la iglesia, y los puso en una puerta, y protestó. Y así el nombre de protestante viene de la reforma protestante.
En la misma cinta, Smith también dijo:
Es un triste error de la Iglesia Católica para declarar que Pedro es el fundamento sobre el cual se construyó la iglesia.
En la cinta 5202, Smith dijo:
A veces se produce dentro de los círculos protestantes tal vez una reacción a la posición de que los católicos han puesto a María en el lugar como la intercesora, e incluso algunos hoy en día como la “co-redentora”, y la reacción entre los protestantes es que muchas veces atacan a María para ponerla mas abajo.
En la cinta 5315, Smith dijo:
Y lo vemos en la Iglesia Católica, donde el sacerdote dice: "Tú vienes a confesar tus pecados a mí, y me voy al Padre para remitir tus pecados, y yo me haré cargo de las cosas para ti. Se trata de poner a un hombre entre tu y Dios. Vamos a ver que el sistema se desarrollara cuando llegamos a la iglesia de Tiatira, pero por lo menos en la iglesia de Éfeso dice: “lo odio”, y el Señor dice: “Yo lo odio también”.
Más tarde en la misma cinta, Smith dijo:
Estos son los temas dominantes de la Iglesia Católica: su amor, su servicio, su fe, su paciencia y su trabajo, y la Iglesia tiene muchas buenas obras, y hay gente maravillosa en la Iglesia Católica, muy admirada: Madre Teresa, como una persona poco común. Maravillosa. No está diciendo cosas en contra de las personas, porque Dios tiene sus vencedores. Es simplemente hablar sobre el sistema.
Más tarde, Smith dijo:
“Y a ella he dado tiempo para arrepentirse de su fornicación, y no se ha arrepentido. He aquí, yo la arrojo en cama, y los que con ella adulteran, en muy grande tribulación, si no se arrepienten de sus actos." Aquí está en primer lugar, la indicación de que la Iglesia Católica va a existir hasta la venida de Jesucristo y el rapto de la iglesia, porque Dios habla de los que les permitirá entrar a la gran tribulación.
Estos son ejemplos típicos de los sermones de la Capilla Calvario que fácilmente pueden ser encontrados en cualquier lugar, entre varios pastores de Calvary Chapel en todo el país. En la última cita anterior, Smith compara la Iglesia Católica a la peor forma de iglesia que se encuentra en el Libro de la Revelación. Aunque, por supuesto, los pastores suelen comparar el Calvary Chapel a lo mejor del cristianismo y a algunas de las iglesias mejores que se encuentran en el Libro de la Revelación. En mi propia experiencia, en una capilla del Calvario dirigida por uno de los discípulos directos de Smith, parecía que había por lo menos un pequeño ataque al catolicismo cada semana.

También se pueden encontrar libros especiales y una “serie de audio”, hecha por pastores de Calvary Chapel, diseñada específicamente con el propósito de atacar a la religión católica. En parte, creo que esto se debe a un número inusual de pastores de Calvary Chapel que sí son ex-católicos. La afiliación se inició en el sur de California, una región muy católica de los Estados Unidos, y como resultado, sus bancos están regularmente llenos de ex-católicos que se han convertido al "Evangelio según Calvary Chapel". Un pequeño porcentaje de estos conversos desafectos pasaron a convertirse en pastores de la afiliación.

Usted se estará preguntando por qué estoy tratando con este grupo evangélico-protestante. Hay después de todo, cientos de diferentes organizaciones anti-católicas en Estados Unidos. Entonces, ¿qué tiene de especial este? Bueno, te diré. Yo fui un "miembro" de Calvary Chapel. De hecho, incluso me convirtió en uno de sus maestros. Todo esto fue antes de mi conversión al catolicismo, por supuesto. Personalmente puedo testificar que he escuchado con regularidad, con mis propios oídos, grandes volúmenes de la retórica anti-católica. Como maestro en la “Capilla del Calvario”, he sido testigo de un muy popular pastor de la “Capilla del Calvario” en el sur de California, en realidad llamar a la Iglesia Católica la "Ramera de Babilonia", y al Papa el "Anticristo" en más de una ocasión. Estos sucedieron ante una numerosa cantidad de gente, muchos de los cuales eran ex- católicos. Personalmente puedo testificar que las doctrinas católicas son tomadas fuera del contexto, y representadas falsamente, y difamadas en forma regular en “Calvary Chapel” en toda América. A veces parece que es raro no oir durante una semana determinada, incluso en un solo semon, al menos un pequeño pinchazo en contra del catolicismo.

Como ex maestro de Capilla del Calvario, tengo sentimientos mixtos acerca de esta organización. Por un lado, tengo que dar crédito donde el crédito es debido. Habiendo sido criado en un hogar de protestante no practicantes, “Calvary Chapel” me ayudó mucho cuando yo estaba luchando con mi fe como una persona joven. “Calvary Chapel” me ayudó a comprender mejor las doctrinas básicas de la fe cristiana. “Calvary Chapel” también me ayudó a resolver los hábitos de pecado en mi vida, y me puso en una senda de mayor obediencia al Evangelio de Jesucristo. Además de eso, fue a través de mis estudios pastorales en “Calvary Chapel” que llegue a un conocimiento de la historia de la Iglesia, un conocimiento que eventualmente llevaría a mi conversión católica. Así, por una parte, agradezco a Calvary Chapel, porque sin ella, probablemente nunca podria haber encontrado a Cristo y más tarde haber entrado en su única, santa, católica y apostólica Iglesia. Por otro lado, me siento frustrado con esta organización, porque engaña a la gente sobre la Iglesia Católica de Cristo. Los que no toman el tiempo para hacer el estudio, y de esos hay muchos, que se ven obligados a confiar en lo que simplemente los pastores de Calvary Chapel les enseñan de la Iglesia Católica. Un buen número de esas cosas están mal, y la mayor parte ni siquiera se originan dentro de Calvary Chapel. De hecho, la mayoría del material anti-católico, usado por pastores de Calvary Chapel, no proviene de la propia organización, sino de fuentes externas que se especializan en el anti-catolicismo.

Si usted es un católico que asiste a la Capilla del Calvario, o ha sido contactado por alguien de Calvary Chapel, como un ex profesor de Calvary Chapel, tengo un buen consejo para ti. Parar y hacer la tarea! Hay un montón de cosas que los pastores de Calvary Chapel dicen sobre el catolicismo que simplemente no son ciertas. Muchos de estos pastores son ex-católicos, ellos mismos, y uno pensaría que debería saber mejor. Sin embargo, usted se sorprendería al descubrir lo poco que estos supuestamente hombres "educados" realmente saben acerca de las creencias católicas y la Iglesia Católica. Yo sugiero que hagas un poco de lectura sobre esta lista de temas HERE, donde se encuentra uno de los más exhaustivos recursos de la apologética católica en Internet. Si por el contrario, eres un no-católico que asiste a la Capilla del Calvario, anímate a hacer lo mismo, de modo que tu puedas tener una mejor comprensión del catolicismo directamente de la Iglesia, en lugar de confiar en la información de segunda mano distribuida por algunos católicos descontentos, que más tarde se convirtieron en pastores de Calvary Chapel. Muchos de los cuales obtuvieron su información de fuentes ni siquiera afiliadas a Calvary Chapel. También me animo a tomar el desafío del “Ultimo Protestante”. Creo que es un buen consejo, y usted debe de escuchar a ambas partes de la historia, valorar las pruebas, y aprender la verdad.

********** ********** Actualización 01/12/2010

EL CABALLERO CATOLICO: Así que ha sido más de tres años desde que escribí esta entrada del blog original en contra de Calvary Chapel-catolicismo, y nada ha cambiado. De camino a casa después de hacer unas compras en la ciudad hoy, decidí oír una emisora de radio local de Calvary Chapel transmitido a través de la sindicación vía satélite. (No estoy seguro de lo que me hizo hacerlo.) De todos modos, el administrador de la estación acababa de invitar a Chuck Smith en el aire para contestar algunas preguntas de los oyentes. Una persona que llamó mencionó que su novia es católica, y de vez en cuando asiste a misa con ella. Había una pregunta sobre la aparición de "Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe". No era de mas de cinco minutos en el show, cuando Chuck Smith tenia mucho que decir.

En primer lugar, proclamó que "Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe" no es más que un espíritu demoníaco, y la propia aparición es un engaño del diablo. Aconsejó a la persona que llamaba evitar tener algo que ver con ella. En segundo lugar, , como si eso fuera poco, comenzó a acusar a la Iglesia Católica de la idolatría y la apostasía. Lo hizo en su forma habitual: con voz suave, (que casi se podía oír la sonrisa en su rostro), que yo solía pensar que era la caridad. Doce años después de haber dejado Calvary Chapel, ahora empieza a sonar un poco espeluznante. De todos modos, utilizó un argumento clásico pero muy falso. Él, evidentemente cambiando la enseñanza católica, alegó que la Iglesia pone a María por encima de Cristo. Luego procedió a derribar este falso argumento en contra de la Iglesia que el presento (como si fuera la verdad), diciendo que cada vez que alguien (es decir, la Iglesia Católica) pone a alguien o algo por encima de Cristo, sabemos que no puede ser de Dios. Por supuesto, la persona que llamaba se expreso lleno de gratitud por la “pontificación” del Pastor Smith, y el administrador de la estación a continuación, procedió a aconsejar la radio oyente, mientras tocaba música, que se mantenga alejado de la Misa Católica y, en su lugar, ir a la Capilla del Calvario.

Cuanto más cambian las cosas, más permanecen igual, sobre todo cuando se trata de la lucha contra el catolicismo que sale de Calvary Chapel. Me complace que estas injurias en contra la Iglesia en particular, procedían de la parte superior – del pastor de Calvary Chapel mismo - Chuck Smith - el hombre que comenzó toda la cadena. Demuestra lo que he estado diciendo todo el tiempo en esta entrada del blog. El fundador de Calvary Chapel es un loco anti-católico, y la manzana nunca cae lejos del árbol. La forma en que el fundador se va, también lo hacen los seguidores. Este tipo de anti-catolicismo se puede encontrar entre los pastores de Calvary Chapel de costa a costa. Algunos son más virulentos que otros, pero casi todos ellos buscan al Pastor Chuck Smith como su ejemplo y maestro. Él es, después de todo, lo más parecido a un "papa" que se puede encontrar en la red de Calvary Chapel.

La manera en que el Pastor Chuck Smith trata de tanta deshonestidad con la doctrina católica es inexcusable. Él es un hombre culto que ha estado en el ministerio desde hace décadas. Él es la virtual "cabeza" de una organización internacional sin denominación-afiliación. Tiene misioneros en América Latina y en Roma. Usted no me puede decir que este hombre es ignorante de la auténtica doctrina de la Iglesia Católica. Él sabe muy bien que la Iglesia Católica NO pone el lugar de María por encima de Cristo de ninguna manera. Él sabe que la Iglesia enseña que María está subordinada a Cristo, y que todo lo que ella es viene directamente de Cristo. Sus opiniones sobre las apariciones marianas son sus negocios, pero, decirle a la gente que son demoníacas es, por lo menos, ser ingenuo. Ningún espíritu demoníaco lleva a la gente a Cristo, y si "Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe" se suponía que era un engaño satánico, fue un fracaso por parte del diablo, ya que resultó en más de un millón de personas (nativos americanos) aceptaron a Jesucristo como su Señor y Salvador. Desde entonces se ha inspirado en la fe cristiana de decenas de millones. Si se supone que es una mentira del diablo, seguro es que le salió a favor de Jesucristo. Por supuesto sabemos la verdad. María se le apareció a San Juan Diego para llevar su pueblo a su Hijo - Jesús Cristo - y que ella lo hizo de la manera más sorprendente y milagrosa.

¿Entonces por qué usa la falacia del “hombre de paja” (es decir – describir a una persona con argumentos falsos, para atacarla )? ¿Por qué un hombre culto, que sin duda sabe lo que la Iglesia enseña con respecto a María, se pone a distorsionar deliberadamente la doctrina de la Iglesia, de tal forma que fácilmente podría derribar el argumento falso que desarrolla en contra de la Iglesia Católica que él creó? Bueno, no puedo entender lo que se encuentra en la cabeza de Chuck Smith, así que realmente no lo sé con absoluta certeza por qué lo hizo. Pero sí tengo una opinión, y creo que es un ser bastante educado con algo de información en el interior. Mi opinión es que Calvary Chapel comenzó en el sur de California, que es una parte muy católica de los Estados Unidos. La mayoría de las personas que asisten a Calvary Chapel son ex-católicos. No tengo un porcentaje exacto, pero yo diría que al menos la mitad sería una suposición razonable. La mayoría de ellos abandonaron la Iglesia Católica durante los tiempos turbulentos de la década de 1970 hasta 1990. Fue durante este tiempo que Chuck Smith, y sus discípulos comenzaron su ministerio de propaganda anti-católica, y WOW, como creció! Ellos trajeron a decenas de ex-católicos a ser "miembros" en sus afiliaciones con esta tontería, junto con sus enseñanzas apocalípticas sobre la actualidad y sus invitaciones de “venir al altar” para recibir la salvación instantánea. Fue (y sigue siendo) una fórmula que funciona. Cada domingo en el sur de California, Calvary Chapel esta llena de gente parada, y los platos que se pasan entre estas personas se llenan de dinero. Smith y sus discípulos en su “ministerio” han traído su falso "Evangelio según Calvary Chapel" a América Latina, e incluso, hayan sido tan descarados para llevarlo a Roma, hasta abajo de la sombra del Vaticano. La fórmula funciona. Se alejan católicos, y los convierte en contra de Roma de la forma más virulenta. También llena las bancas en Calvary Chapel, así como los platos de colección. En mi opinión, la razón por la cual Chuck Smith no cambia es porque él no puede cambiar. Si alguna vez admite que estaba equivocado acerca de algo que la Iglesia Católica enseña, eso pondría en peligro su organización. En el sur de California, por lo menos la mitad de su ministerio es con ex-católicos. Una admisión de un error, sobre todo después de haber predicado estas cosas durante tanto tiempo, haría que los fieles de Calvary Chapel van a comenzar a cuestionar la totalidad del sistema “Capilla del Calvario”, y eso es algo que ni Chuck Smith ni sus discípulos en su “ministerio” no quieren arriesgar..

Sabtu, 26 Juni 2010

Dispensationalism - A Religion of Fear & Bad Politics

(WND) - Is there a spiritual, biblical connection to the BP oil catastrophe?

A new video on YouTube is suggesting a possible link to the disaster due to America's recent treatment of Israel, and at least one well-known Bible analyst, Hal Lindsey, thinks there's a valid correlation.

The video was produced and posted today by Carl Gallups of the Hickory Hammock Baptist Church in Milton, Florida...

read full story here
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: Wow! This is the reaction of some Dispensationalists to the oil catastrophe in the Gulf. I suppose IF it is a direct chastisement of God (which it probably is) it has nothing to do with our national crimes of abortion, euthanasia and embryonic stem cell research. I suppose it has nothing to do with our national immorality of rampant sexual license. I suppose it has nothing to do with our exploitation of cheap child labor in third-world countries to maintain our standard of living in the USA. I suppose it has nothing to do with our election of Marxists to the highest levels of government, nor our bloating national debt. I suppose it has nothing to do with banning prayer in public schools and persecuting Christians for street witnessing. I suppose it has nothing to do with the sad reality that most Americans care more about materialism than morality. I suppose it has nothing to do with the fact that we choose to exploit the natural resources of everybody else, rather than our own. I suppose it has nothing to do with us finally getting what's been coming to us for a VERY long time. Nooooo! Because the catastrophe happened to coincide with a certain date, plus 1 day, on the Israeli calendar, it all has to do with our lack of unconditional support of Israel and the Zionist agenda that has turned the Middle East into a tinderbox.

Wow! I would like to say I'm surprised but sadly I am not. Dispensationalism has now become a religion of 100% international politics, and 100% Zionist agenda. In other words, if you don't support the Israeli government unconditionally, regardless of their anti-Christian decisions, than by the hand of God, your nation will be laid waste.

Dispensationalism is a philosophy created by Freemasons in the middle 19th century and sold mainly to Protestants in the United Kingdom and the United States. Today it is primarily embraced by many Evangelicals, Pentecostals and some Baptists almost exclusively in the United States. Some US Catholics have even bought into this. The idea behind it is that the Church is not really the new Israel (as it says in the New Testament), but rather the land of Palestine is the "true Israel" only when it is occupied by people who call themselves Jews whether they practice Judaism or not. The political activity that promotes the return of Jews to the Palestinian area, and sponsors the policies of the Israeli government, is called Zionism. This was also a political ideology spawned by Freemasons in the middle 19th century. Since the creation of the State of Israel in 1948 a convergence has developed between Zionism and Dispensationalism. It has now reached the point where the majority of the world's Zionists are American Christians operating under the Dispensational mindset. Yes, there are now more Christian Zionists in America than Jewish Zionists in the whole world.

As I stated in a previous blog entry, it is high time for Western Christians to get back into the business of promoting CHRISTIANITY rather than the Masonic-Zionist pipe dream that is the current State of Israel. Western Christians need to start supporting Christians in the Holy Land, and the indigenous churches of the Middle East. Only by doing this can we fulfill our Christian calling overseas, and ever hope to bring peace to that part of the world.

If you want to do your part to help Christians in the Middle East, it is possible. Yes, you really can. It's not hard. It's simple and safe. All you need do is CLICK HERE and start by making a small donation to bring the Gospel to this war torn region. 'The Catholic Knight' is a regular contributor to this cause. Why won't you enlist in Christ's army of love and join me in the battle for souls? What's stopping you?

Beyond that, it would help tremendously if we start practicing a little old fashioned gospel Christianity here at home too. Maybe if we did that, God wouldn't be so inclined to curse us with oil spills.

Kamis, 03 Juni 2010

Vatican Decries Recent Events - Calls Israeli Occupation Of Palestine "Unjust"

(Catholic Culture) - The Vatican has expressed intense concern about the Israeli raid on the "Freedom Flotilla" headed for the Gaza Strip on May 31.

Father Federico Lombardi, the director of the Vatican press office, decried the "needless loss of lives" in the attack, which left at least 20 people dead and others wounded.

Reminding reporters that Pope Benedict XVI will soon be traveling to the Middle East for a pastoral visit to Crete, Father Lombardi said that the Pontiff will follow the latest crisis there with great care....

read full story here

---------------------


(Herald Sun) - A VATICAN document leaked overnight calls the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories a "political injustice".

The occupation is a "political injustice imposed on the Palestinians," the Vatican says, according to extracts quoted by Italy's ANSA news agency.

"The Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories makes daily life difficult for freedom of movement, the economy and social and religious life," the text says.

The Instrumentum Laboris, a working document on an upcoming synod of bishops on the Middle East, was embargoed for release until Monday, when Pope Benedict XVI was to present it during a visit to Cyprus...

read full story here

---------------------


(AP) – The Vatican said Sunday that the international community is ignoring the plight of Christians in the Middle East, and that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the war in Iraq and political instability in Lebanon have forced thousands to flee the region.
A working paper released during Pope Benedict XVI's pilgrimage to Cyprus to prepare for a crisis summit of Middle East bishops in Rome in October also cites the "extremist current" unleashed by the rise of "political Islam" as a threat to Christians....

read full story here
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: The problem here is twofold. The Israelis have an embargo on all ships approaching the Gaza Strip. They believe this gives them the authority to board and search every ship that attempts to come into port. In this most recent case, the Turkish government (one of the most moderate Islamic governments in the middle east) sponsored a relief flotilla to help the Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip. The Israelis boarded the ship in a surprise commando style, which is part of their embargo enforcement, and they were greeted with violence.

The Turkish government stands by the claim that the flotilla contained no weapons, and no weapons were being shipped. This may very well be the case from the perspective of the Turkish government, however, it looks like the type of weapons used against the Israeli commandos were personal weapons - such as knives, slingshots, metal bars, etc. The Israelis opened fire, and as a result twenty people lost their lives.

The situation in Israel is a difficult one for Christians in the West to fully comprehend. Of course, many American Evangelicals (influenced by the heretical teachings of Dispensationalism) believe the modern nation-state of Israel is the "real Israel" promised by God for the last days, and they will support the Zionist agenda of Israeli supremacy whether it's right or wrong, no matter who it hurts. On the flip side, the Islamic regimes of the Middle East have a history of being extremely intolerant tyrannies. To make matters worse, some of them have been influenced by radical Islamist ideologues who's only agenda is to wipe Israel off the map and kill every non-Muslim in the region.

It helps to step back and look at things in a dispassionate historical way.

First and foremost, as Catholic Christians we need to understand who we are, in order to understand our relation to Israel. A non-biased study of the New Testament, along with the context of early Christian writings, reveals that the Church (particularly the Catholic Church) is the "New Israel of God." The Lord brought the strictly Jewish Kingdom of Israel to an end in 33 AD with the death and resurrection of Israel's messianic King - Jesus Christ. In AD 70 the physical remnants of that strictly Jewish Kingdom were brought to an end with the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple. According to St. Paul the Apostle, an astute Jewish rabbi and author of two-thirds of the New Testament, the Jewish people can continue to be part of the Kingdom of Israel by submitting to Israel's King - who is none other than Jesus of Nazereth - the promised Messiah. Upon submitting to the King, they will fulfill their faith and be grafted into the New Kingdom of Israel - which is the Catholic Church. Jews who refuse to acknowledge their King will remain outside this New Kingdom of Israel - the Catholic Church. They are still Jews of course, and retain their identity as God's original chosen people, but they are incomplete without their King and are outside their own Kingdom! This was the accepted view of the early Christians and should be our view today.

What complicates this is recent history. In the late 1800s two religious-political movements began to take shape in the Western world - Dispensationalism and Zionism. Some believe these two movements were spawned by the same source known as Freemasonry, or the Masonic Lodge, and there is evidence to support this. Dispensationalism was designed for Protestant Christianity, while Zionism was designed for Judaism. A hundred years later the two would merge into what we might call "Dispensational-Zionism," and become the driving political influence of the Middle Eastern mess we know today. To make a long story short, Dispensationalism is the theology created by John Nelson Darby, and popularized by Cyrus I. Scofield (creator of the Scofield Reference Bible), which teaches that the Church is not Israel. Instead, it teaches that Israel is primarily a piece of real estate in the Middle East. That real estate, according to Dispensationalism, becomes prophetically energized once it is occupied by people who call themselves "Jews" regardless if they practice the religion of Judaism or not. Dispensationalism regards the Church as God's mere afterthought, and "accident of providence" so to speak, in which God is simply using it as an external vehicle to bring in the Gentiles while he prepares his real plan of salvation for the Jewish people (or "true Israel"). Because of this, Dispensationalism teaches that Protestant Christians MUST support the political State of Israel financially and politically, at all costs, and without reservation or doubt. As for Catholic Christians, well, they just need to stop being Catholic you see, because Dispensationalism is usually accompanied by a hefty dose of anti-Catholicism. There are many examples of this from contemporary Dispensationalist teachers, too many to count here.

As for Zionism, that was designed primarily for the Jews of the 1800s and early 1900s. However, now that Zionism has merged with Dispensationalism, we can honestly say that the majority of the world's Zionists are not Jews - but Evangelical Protestants!!!

Nevertheless, classical Zionism is simply the teaching that Jews need not wait for the Messiah to lead them back to the promised land, even though that is what their rabbis have taught them for centuries. They can and should, according to Zionism, go back themselves (without the Messiah), build up Israel all on their own, and do so using force if necessary. The history of the Jewish people in the 20th century is both complex and tragic. Zionism began in earnest during the first decades of the 20th century. It's biggest supporters initially were none other than Communist Russia and Nazi Germany. It was seen as a way to "get rid of the Jews" and simultaneously create a model socialist republic in the Middle East. It was only after World War II that Zionism took on a more humanitarian role as a refuge for persecuted survivors of the Holocaust and began to align more closely with the West - particularly the United States. In 1948 the Zionist dream became reality as the State of Israel was created. The very next day war broke out between Israel and it's Arab neighbors. The State of Israel has been fighting a series of perpetual wars (external and internal) ever since. The Turkish relief flotilla raid that has recently sparked outrage around the world is just the latest episode.

Epic heresies, over a hundred years in the making, have brought us to this point in history. The heresies that denied the Church as the New Kingdom of Israel effectively denied Jesus as the King, and in doing so not only coddled those Jews who continued to reject him, but also turned millions of Protestant Christians into their supporters. Today, the United States of America stands as the Dispensational-Zionist capitol of the world. National foreign policy is built on this religious-political ideology. A large number of the American Jewish population is strongly Zionist, while an even larger number of the American Evangelical population is strongly Dispensational. Because of this, the United States has been Israel's strongest supporter, and because of this the Israeli government has grown accustomed to thinking it can do whatever it wants because it knows the United States will back it. This is abruptly changing with the Obama administration, and as a result, Israel is now caught in a very precarious situation.

We cannot know how World War III will start, but we can be sure of how it will end. As far as the Middle East is concerned, World War III will end with the profound crippling of the Arab states, and the total annihilation of the Israeli state. Such a thought is inconceivable to many American Evangelicals who are convinced that God is miraculously protecting the Israelis. The destruction of the Israeli state will inevitably be a faith-shaking event for most American Evangelicals, unless they unshackle themselves from the Dispensational-Zionist heresy. Don't think however, the Arab nations will get off the hook. The devastation that Israel alone can bring upon them is enough to blow away a hundred years of industrial development. So in any kind of all out Arab-Israeli war will only result in losers - no winners.

As Catholic Christians there is not much we can do about this whole situation. It is the result of Protestantism meets Judaism in an epic heresy most probably spawned by Freemasonry over 150 years ago. At this point the ball is already in motion, it has been for some time, and all we can do is wait to see the outcome. There is no sense in choosing sides, or rooting for one group against the other. The Zionists and Dispensationals have in mind the very anti-Christian goal of undermining the New Kingdom of Israel (the Catholic Church) with the modern Nation-State of Israel. While the surrounding Islamic powers are just anti-Christian in general. Caught in the middle are Christians on both sides - Israeli Christians and Palestinian Christians. The one and only group we should side with is our Christian brethren. That is all. Beyond that we should simply decry the violence and pray for the peace of Jerusalem. It can be tempting at times for Catholic Americans to side with Israel. While it is also tempting for Catholic Europeans to side with Palestine. The best thing we can do is leave politics out of it. The whole situation was spawned by heresy -- anti-Catholic heresy at that! We must resist temptation to choose sides and simply support our Christian brethren trapped in the middle. Pray for peace for all parties involved, and that both Israeli Jews and Palestinian Muslims will discover the gospel of Jesus Christ as the one and only workable "roadmap to peace."

Minggu, 14 Maret 2010

Zionism Prepares To Trump Christianity


(WND) - The International Temple Mount Awareness Day is being planned by a coalition of Jewish groups, including The Temple Institute, the Organization for the Renewal of the Temple (ORT), Women in Green, the Temple Mount Heritage Foundation and Israel National Radio.

"We call on Jews and Gentiles around the world to mark March 16th as a day of solidarity with the Temple Mount and the prophetic vision of 'a house of prayer for all nations,'" reads a statement from the organizers of the event...

read full story here

THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: This is how it's being sold to us. Christians are being told it's a human rights issue, and that it's not just about the Jews. We're being told the Temple Mount is for all of us, and that everyone (particularly Jews and Christian) should be able to pray there 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. We're being told that it's "unfair" that Muslims are allowed to pray there almost 24/7 and people of other religions are not.

What we're not being told is that it is the Israeli government that has made this arrangement, that it is the Israeli government that backs it, and it is the Israeli government that helps to enforce it. The policy that is so "unfair" to the Jews is in fact put upon them by their own supposed "Jewish" government. True, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that Israeli police must make provision for public Jewish prayer on the site. However, the policy of banning all non-Muslims from the site on certain days originally came out of the Ariel Sharon administration. Israeli police continue to refuse to abide by the Supreme Court ruling due to safety concerns. Notice however, the Supreme Court ruling doesn't necessarily deal with Christian or adherents of other religions. Rather, it deals specifically with Jews and their supposed "right" to organize public prayer on the Temple Mount site.

What we have here is a covert attempt by certain Zionists to co-opt Christians (and others) into pressuring their own government into implementing a Supreme Court ruling that primarily deals with not only letting Jews onto the Temple Mount 24/7 but also organize public prayer there. One of the reasons why Palestinian Muslims are so hostile toward letting non-Muslims (particularly Jews) pray on the Temple Mount during Jewish holy days (Sabbath, Passover, Pentecost, Trumpets, Atonement, Tabernacles, Hanukkah, etc.) is the fear that over time the Jews will co-opt the site and pave the way for the rebuilding of the Temple itself. Of course Muslims don't want this for fear of how that might interfere with Islamic worship on the site, and how it further stakes the Jewish claim on the Temple Mount, Jerusalem and the Palestinian West Bank. What the Muslims see in this, coupled with expanded Jewish settlements in the Palestinian West Bank, is a Zionist strategy of relentless incrementalism.

Now 'The Catholic Knight' is not taking the side of the Muslims here. I could care less about their silly mosque on that arid hilltop and what goes on inside there. It is built on the site that God judged and destroyed nearly 2,000 years ago, using a Pagan Roman army as punishment upon the Jewish leaders of that time, for the rejection of their Messiah, HIS Only Begotten Son, and the gospel preached by his apostles. Upon the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ the Temple ceased to be a place of authentic worship of God. While the Jews of that time attempted to worship God in that Temple, God himself was actually hanging on a cross outside the city walls - despised and rejected. God gave the Jewish leaders forty years (one Biblical generation) to repent of this. They failed to do so. Instead they rebelled against their Roman occupiers demanding independence. Convinced that God would rise up to help them as he did for the Maccabeans centuries before, they believed themselves capable of defeating the Roman army. God rose up all right, on the side of the Pagan Romans, and revisited his people once again in the form of judgment and destruction. The purpose was to put an end, once and for all, to the sacrificial system set up under the Old Covenant, so as to chide future generations of Jews into accepting the permenant sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

Rebuilding the Temple Mount into another symbol of rejection of the true Messiah has always been the goal of many Jewish leaders throughout history, and history tells us they have been willing to collaborate with literally ANYONE to make it happen. Perhaps one of their greatest allies was the Pagan Roman emperor "Julian the Apostate." In AD 363, Julian agreed to help the Jews rebuild the Temple because he (as a Pagan) understood how it's very presence undermined the Christian gospel message, and created confusion about the legitimacy of Jesus Christ's claim to be the Jewish Messiah - and therefore by extension anybody's Messiah! Interestingly enough, God had other plans. As work on the foundation began, strange "balls of fire" (probably methane gas eruptions from seismic activity) continually burst forth from the rocks, scorching workers and bringing construction to a stand still. Eventually the work was abandoned. Some 1,500 years later another emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte, agreed to help the Jews rebuild their Temple for similar reasons as Julian the Apostate. However, a little military defeat at the Battle of Waterloo in June of 1815 put an end to that plan. Of course the rabbis have a saying that "coincidence is not a kosher word" and for Christians there ought to be a lesson in these historical events. What is that lesson? It's simple really. God DOES NOT want the Jewish Temple rebuilt! God knows it will be used as a means to undermine the Gospel message and ultimately create a false religion that claims to worship HIM, but in reality rejects HIS Only Begotten Son, and therefore rejects HIM by extension.

In the video above, and the story cited as well, please pay special attention to the pitch line. Worship on the Temple Mount, and later of course the rebuilt Temple itself, is not just a "Jewish thing." According to the Zionist pitch men, it's for ALL PEOPLE - everyone - to become a central place a worship and a conduit if you will, between the human and the divine. Stop and think about that for a second. Exactly what are they saying? They're saying the Temple Mount and their rebuilt Temple (not Jesus Christ) is to become the conduit (or mediator) between God and man. Is this not the ultimate heresy for a Christian? Can this be anything else but apostasy?

As if that were not bad enough, there is more. Already the ancient Jewish Sanhedrin has been reformed (learn more here), and with it a new extension of Judaism has been created for Gentiles called Noahidism (learn more here). It's based on the Biblical account of the covenant between God and Noah after the Great Flood. The gist of this new religion is simple. Noahidism is for Gentiles, while Judaism is for Jews. Of course Jews have the more difficult covenant to keep with 613 commandments. While Gentiles (under Noahidism) need only keep 7 commandments. Of course, this makes it easier for Gentiles to be accepted and categorized in a purely Jewish context. Under Noahidism, a Muslim could theoretically be accepted as a Noahide. The same could be said for Deists or Theists, which is what most non-religious Westerners espouse as their most common belief in divinity. Of course Noahidism would also be very compatible with Freemasonry. However, a doctrinally orthodox Christian could not be accepted as a Noahide because of his belief in the Trinity, which allegedly violates the Noahide command to worship only God, and of course God is defined by the rabbinical Talmud. Theoretically, a Jehovah's Witness could be a Noahide, but not a Catholic or a Protestant. All that aside, what is really interesting is how this plays out once the Temple is rebuilt, because you see there would have to be different courtyards on the Temple Mount separating Jews from Noahides. Can you see a religious caste system developing here? It's similar to what existed during Jesus' time, and in the centuries before, wherein practicing Jews held a more privileged position in the Temple than God fearing Gentiles, no matter how devout they were.

Christian prophecy makes it clear that the Jewish Temple will not be successfully rebuilt until the last days of the end times just before the bodily Return of Jesus Christ. Historically speaking, every previous attempt to rebuild the Temple has resulted in disaster, postponement or cancellation for various reasons. Christian prophecy also indicates that when the Temple is rebuilt, it will be used by the final Antichrist (a Jewish messianic figure) to lead the world into total rejection of Jesus Christ and outright rebellion against God's plan. Unless we are to believe the coming of Antichrist is right around the corner, we can only conclude that this latest Zionist attempt, to reclaim the Temple Mount and rebuild the Temple, will only result in disaster. While we may now have the framework for the final last days scenario, there are still some key end times prophecies that must be fulfilled first...
  1. The world's economic and political power base must shift to the middle east.
  2. The Gospel must be preached to every corner of the world and made widely available for anyone to accept. Nations all over the whole world must be converted.
  3. Sometime after this, there must be a worldwide apostasy of Gentile Christians. (What we have right now is only a regional apostasy in the western world, as Christian missionary work in Africa and Asia is booming!)
For this reason, 'The Catholic Knight' believes we are not yet in the time of the last days, even though we have been living in the end times for centuries. Rather, what we can expect to befall the Zionists is the same thing that befell others who tried to rebuild the Temple. At the very least this is a delay or cancellation due to political reasons. Or else we can expect calamity to befall those who live in Israel. In fact, based on current political and regional news, it's probably safe to assume that Israel will soon be plunged into massive war. I'm guessing that Jerusalem as we know it will be destroyed, and perhaps even the Dome of the Rock as well. Don't assume however that the destruction of the Dome of the Rock will automatically spell the rebuilding of the Temple. As I said, this WILL NOT happen until God is ready to close the book on human history.

So we should keep in mind that ANY Christian cooperation with Jews on the Temple Mount project will only result in cooperating with an anti-Christian agenda. Right now the Zionists are preparing to fool the world into believing the situation on Jerusalem is a human rights issue that affects people of all religions. It does not. There is no religious reason for Christians to worship on the Temple Mount on any day of the year. Likewise, the rabbis have created a religious system in the Talmud that allows Judaism to function as a religion even without the Temple Mount, or even the Temple itself. Their innability to worship there when they want to is not our problem, nor is it any kind of priority for Christians to get involved in. The Israeli Jews are contending with THEIR OWN government on this issue. In other words, it's an internal problem within the Jewish world, and Christians should stay out of it.

As a general rule of thumb, Christians should avoid all matters relating to Zionism, as it is by definition a movement against the Spirit of God. Evangelical Protestants in the United States are quick to point to Israeli military victories, such as the Six-Day War an the Yom Kippur War, as "signs" of God's blessing on the Israeli state and an indication that God wants Christians to support Zionism. However, they fail to point out that Israel has been in a state of perpetual war against Muslim regimes and sects for almost the entire duration of it's existence, and did not have such golden success in the Israeli-Lebanon War in recent years. To claim that military victory is tantamount to God's blessing is arrogant and stupid. So was God blessing the Pagan Roman Empire when he allowed it to destroy the Jewish nation in 70 AD? Was God blessing Russia when he allowed it victory over the tiny nation of Georgia recently? Was God blessing Germany when he allowed it to take over Bravaria? Was God blessing England when he allowed it to take over Northern Ireland? Was God blessing Vietnam when he allowed the Communists to defeat the Americans? Was God blessig North Korea when he allowed the Communists to keep American forces in the South? The list goes on and on, and I think I've made my point. Military victory does not equate God's blessing on a regime. What it means is that God has allowed that regime to survive for now (either to his liking or not) for reasons related to this providencial plan.

Zionism, in all it's forms, leads to an anti-Christian gospel, because it's ultimate design is to rebuild a Jewish nation and the Jewish Temple against the will of God. If you're a Christian, especially a Catholic Christian, then you're supposed to believe salvation comes through Jesus Christ for all people, especially the Jews. If you're a Christian, especially a Catholic Christian, then you should understand why God has been dealing with his people (the Jews) the way he has for the last 2000 years. He is trying to chide them into understanding that Jesus of Nazereth is their Messiah. If you're a Christian, especially a Catholic Christian, then you should understand that any effort to restore the ancient Temple and it's ceremonies is counterproductive to that end. If you're a Christian, especially a Catholic Christian, then you should know that if the Zionists are successful in obtainig their goals, it will only serve to confuse many Christians regarding the nature of Christ's sacrifice, and will become a counterpoint to Christian missionary work if potential converts think their is another (seemingly simplier) way of approaching the God of Israel through Noahidism and the restored Temple. If you're a Christian, especially a Catholic Christian, then you must understand that any support of Zionist goals is counterproductive to the missionary work of the Church and may possibly be a mortal sin.

So what should be the Christian attitude toward Zionism, the Temple Mount campaigns, and the Nation of Israel itself? Well, probably the best thing Christians can do is just be Christians. We should be indifferent toward Zionist political goals, and Muslim counter resistence to them. Rather we should simply recognize that the gospel of Jesus Christ is the ONLY real solution to all of these problems, and we should show love and respect toward both Muslims and Jews without endorsing or supporting their political agendas.

Jumat, 29 Januari 2010

Sola Scriptura Leads To Moral Relativism


THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: Okay it's time for "The Catholic Knight" to stir the pot again, so here it goes. I'm going to make the assertion that Martin Luther's heretical doctrine of Sola Scriptura is largely responsible for the moral relativism we see in the secular world today.

Here is the problem. Go to any Protestant church, particularly one of the newer Evangelical nondenominational types. There you will be taught that there is no religious authority outside of the Bible. Now aside from the fact that this assertion is not only unscriptural, but also illogical, it is nevertheless the foundation of most Protestant organizations in the world today. Now the premise that there is no religious authority outside of the Bible inevitably leads people to believe that the Holy Spirit of God is directly responsible for their own interpretation of the Bible. Talk to a good number of Evangelicals and that is exactly what they'll tell you. They'll say they don't need the Catholic Church, or any church organization, to tell them what the Scriptures mean, because they can read the Scriptures for themselves, and the Holy Spirit will automatically lead them to the right interpretation. If we go through Protestant history, we will see that this kind of attitude has been present since the very beginning - even with Martin Luther himself.

Now as we span the panorama of Protestant history, we quickly see where this attitude has led. It's led to division after division after division. What happens is this. Two Protestant pastors come up with mutually contradiction interpretations of some Scripture passage(s). Both believe they are inspired by the Holy Spirit to the correct interpretation and the other is wrong. They can't both be right, and because they both believe there is no religious authority outside the Bible, there is no one to judge between them. So they end up going their separate ways, each taking part of their congregation with them. This is how denominations and affiliations are created. In the 16th century, there were only a few Protestant denominations which could be counted on one hand. Today there are literally thousands. Some say tens of thousands.

Now once we have accepted the notion that the Holy Spirit leads people to contradicting theology because there is no religious authority outside the Bible, it's only a small step to say that the Holy Spirit leads people to contradicting morality for the same reason. Indeed, this is EXACTLY what has happened. In the early 20th century, all Christian denominations agreed that artificial contraception (birth control) was morally wrong and sinful. That changed in 1930 when the Protestant Anglican Communion challenged this Christian moral standard. That was the first major crack in the dam. It wasn't long before others developed. By the end of the 20th century, less than 500 years after Luther's Sola Scriptura revolution, nearly all Christian denominations accepted artificial contraception as morally licit. That's not all though. Many of them accepted divorce too. It gets worse. Some even accepted homosexuality as "part of God's plan" even going to the point of celebrating homosexuality, blessing gay-marriages and ordaining homosexuals to the clergy. Though it seems inconceivable, some of these Protestant denominations even went so far as to say that abortion (a type of infanticide) was morally acceptable under certain circumstances.

Western Christianity had long been divided on theological issues, but now for the first time in modern history, it was divided on moral issues as well. This opened the door of Pandora's Box. With Western Christianity divided on moral issues, it became increasingly easy for morally destructive groups (militant feminists and homosexuals) to begin taking over society, each one insisting that morality is relative, and some of them using Sola Scriptura is their religious excuse.

Catholics need to understand this. One thing really does lead to another, even if it takes centuries. Luther's heresy has played a huge role in bringing Western civilization to its present point of moral decay. Protestants are stuck in a quandary. Those who are honest with themselves will have to reexamine Sola Scriptura in light of what's happened over these last 500 years, and in context with the ancient Christian tradition of episcopal authority. Sadly, most will not. Most will ignore the last 500 years of history, and the moral disaster that has resulted from it. Most will continue to repeat the mantra that there is no religious authority outside the Bible. They will treat Sola Scriptura as the highest authority. There is of course a small problem with that. Sola Scriptura is not found in the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible does it actually say the Bible is the only religious authority. Therefore Sola Scriptura is itself an extra-Biblical tradition! Which means that when Protestants fall back on it, they are falling back on a man-made tradition that is not found in the Bible. So when they say there is no authority outside the Bible, that very notion itself is an authority outside of the Bible. It's a contradiction and an oxymoron. Sadly, few of them will ever see that.

As we approach the 500th anniversary of Sola Scriptura (2020), let us reflect on the doctrinal chaos and moral relativism it has made a significant contribution toward. Granted, I will concede that a large portion of our moral decay has been the product of Godless atheism and Marxism. Some of it has been the result of Humanism, both secular and religious. Nevertheless, Sola Scriptura has taken it's toll and made it's contribution - a significant contribution I might add.

Selasa, 13 Oktober 2009

Stop The North American Union - Rejoin The Commonwealth

Areas shaded blue are Commonwealth Nations

IT IS TIME FOR THE UNITED STATES to join the Commonwealth. Membership in the Commonwealth would facilitate the kind of globalization that is in the American national interest, and it would serve as a hedge against the emergence of a less benign international order based on civilizational power politics. In return, United States membership would offer the Commonwealth a much-needed shot in the arm in terms of resources and ideas that could transform it from a persistent underachiever into a leading model of transcivilizational co-operation.

source
THE CATHOLIC KNIGHT: This is the one and only alternative to the creation of the North American Union, or at the very least, it would serve as a backup method of globalization using natural organic bonds once the Masonic trading blocks of the NAU and EU fail. They will most certainly fail you see, in the most violent ways, once Islam is firmly rooted in Europe and American nationalism becomes mainstream. To learn more about the English Commonwealth click here.